On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:59:11AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mathieu De Zutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > However, i dont want the view to be presorted, but sort it in the
> > queries that use the view. When I do that, the index I have on that
> > field seems to be ignored. It stretches so far that, when I sort the
> > view on A and sort the query on A too, the query will try to sort
> > _again_ _without_ index and thus lose all performance.
>
> This is a limitation of the 7.3 query planner. 7.4 should do better.
Advertising
Ok I'll have to live with that I guess.
Apart from avoiding views or subselects when sorting afterwards and
putting the whole bunch in a huge SQL statement (which i'll have to
produce on-the-fly), do you have an other alternative?
The 2 seconds is way to much, as the database will eventually run on a
machine that is 10 times slower.
With kind regards,
Mathieu
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
