James Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is this just a dead end, or is there some variation of this that might > possibly work, so that ultimately an undoctored literal number, when > applied to an int8 column, could find an index?
I think it's a dead end. What I was playing with this afternoon was removing the int8-and-int4 comparison operators from pg_operator. It works as far as making "int8col = 42" do the right thing, but I'm not sure yet about side-effects. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster