Suchandra Thapa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was thinking using about using a raid 1+0 array to hold the > database but since I can use different array types, would it be > better to use 1+0 for the wal logs and a raid 5 for the database?
It has been recommended on this list that getting a RAID controller with a battery-backed cache is pretty essential to getting good performance. Search the list archives for lots more discussion about RAID configurations. -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match