[PERFORM] Solaris Performance (Again)

[Mark Kirkwood]

This is a well-worn thread title - apologies, but these results seemed 
interesting, and hopefully useful in the quest to get better performance 
on Solaris:

I was curious to see if the rather uninspiring pgbench performance 
obtained from a Sun 280R (see General: ATA Disks and RAID controllers 
for database servers) could be improved if more time was spent 
tuning.        

With the help of a fellow workmate who is a bit of a Solaris guy, we 
decided to have a go.

The major performance killer appeared to be mounting the filesystem with 
the logging option. The next most significant seemed to be the choice of 
sync_method for Pg - the default (open_datasync), which we initially 
thought should be the best - appears noticeably slower than fdatasync.

We also tried changing some of the tuneable filesystem options using 
tunefs - without any measurable effect.

Are Pg/Solaris folks running with logging on and sync_method default out 
there ? - or have most of you been through this already ?

Pgbench Results (no. clients and transactions/s ) :

Setup 1: filesystem mounted with logging

No.     tps
-----------
1       17
2       17
4       22
8       22
16      28
32      32
64      37

Advertising







Setup 2: filesystem mounted without logging

No.     tps
-----------
1       48
2       55
4       57
8       62
16      65
32      82
64      95
Setup 3 : filesystem mounted without logging, Pg sync_method = fdatasync

No.     tps
-----------
1       89
2       94
4       95
8       93
16      99
32      115
64      122
Note : The Pgbench runs were conducted using -s 10 and -t 1000 -c 1->64, 
2 - 3 runs of each setup were performed (averaged figures shown).

Mark

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]