Hello
It is normal behavior PostgreSQL. Use
Advertising
SELECT id FROM tabulka ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT 1;
regards
Pavel
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Ryszard Lach wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have a table with 24k records and btree index on column 'id'. Is this
> normal, that 'select max(id)' or 'select count(id)' causes a sequential
> scan? It takes over 24 seconds (on a pretty fast machine):
>
> => explain ANALYZE select max(id) from ogloszenia;
> QUERY PLAN
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Aggregate (cost=3511.05..3511.05 rows=1 width=4) (actual
> time=24834.629..24834.629 rows=1 loops=1)
> -> Seq Scan on ogloszenia (cost=0.00..3473.04 rows=15204 width=4)
> (actual time=0.013..24808.377 rows=16873 loops=1)
> Total runtime: 24897.897 ms
>
> Maybe it's caused by a number of varchar fields in this table? However,
> 'id' column is 'integer' and is primary key.
>
> Clustering table on index created on 'id' makes such a queries
> many faster, but they still use a sequential scan.
>
> Richard.
>
>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
