On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 19:27:16 -0800,
Mike Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You should bump sort_mem as high as you can stand. with only 8MB sort
> memory available, you're swapping intermediate sort pages to disk --
> a lot. Try the query with sort_mem set to 75MB (to do the entire sort in
> memory).
Postgres also might be able to switch to a hash aggregate instead of
using a sort if sortmem is made large enough to hold the results for
all of the (estimated) groups.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
