On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Andrew Rawnsley wrote:

> 20-25% of the time. Fiddling with CPU_TUPLE_COST doesn't do anything
> until I exceed 0.5, which strikes me as a bit high (though please
> correct me if I am assuming too much...). RANDOM_PAGE_COST seems to have
> no effect.

What about the effective cache size, is that set properly?

/Dennis Björklund

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to