Re: [PERFORM] Insert Times

[Alan Stange]

PC Drew wrote:

I tested this out and saw no improvement:
 

I'd still suspect some class loading issues and HotSpot compilation 
issues are polluting your numbers.    Try using a PreparedStatement to 
another table first in order to make sure that classes bytecode has been 
loaded.   There are some command line options to the JVM to have it 
print out some status info when it is loading classes and compiling 
methods; you might want to turn on those options as well.

-- Alan

EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM one;
Seq Scan on one  (cost=0.00..20.00 rows=1000 width=404) (actual time=0.04..0.50 
rows=51 loops=1)
Total runtime: 0.75 msec
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM one;
Seq Scan on one  (cost=0.00..20.00 rows=1000 width=404) (actual time=0.06..0.50 
rows=51 loops=1)
Total runtime: 0.64 msec
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM one;
Seq Scan on one  (cost=0.00..20.00 rows=1000 width=404) (actual time=0.04..0.40 
rows=51 loops=1)
Total runtime: 0.54 msec
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM one;
Seq Scan on one  (cost=0.00..20.00 rows=1000 width=404) (actual time=0.04..0.41 
rows=51 loops=1)
Total runtime: 0.54 msec
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM one;
Seq Scan on one  (cost=0.00..20.00 rows=1000 width=404) (actual time=0.04..0.41 
rows=51 loops=1)
Total runtime: 0.53 msec
EXPLAIN ANALYZE INSERT INTO one (id, msg) VALUES (1, 'blah');
Result  (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.01..0.02 rows=1 loops=1)
Total runtime: 0.85 msec
EXPLAIN ANALYZE INSERT INTO one (id, msg) VALUES (1, 'blah');
Result  (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.02..0.02 rows=1 loops=1)
Total runtime: 0.15 msec
EXPLAIN ANALYZE INSERT INTO one (id, msg) VALUES (1, 'blah');
Result  (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.02..0.02 rows=1 loops=1)
Total runtime: 0.14 msec
EXPLAIN ANALYZE INSERT INTO one (id, msg) VALUES (1, 'blah');
Result  (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.02..0.02 rows=1 loops=1)
Total runtime: 0.12 msec
EXPLAIN ANALYZE INSERT INTO one (id, msg) VALUES (1, 'blah');
Result  (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.01..0.02 rows=1 loops=1)
Total runtime: 0.12 msec


-----Original Message-----
From:   Leeuw van der, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:   Tue 1/27/2004 12:38 AM
To:     PC Drew; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:     
Subject:        RE: [PERFORM] Insert Times
Hi,

My personal feeling on this is, that the long time taken for the first query
is for loading all sorts of libraries, JVM startup overhead etc.
What if you first do some SELECT (whatever), on a different table, to warm
up the JVM and the database?
regards,

--Tim

THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its
attachments from all computers. 



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
 



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
     joining column's datatypes do not match