After a long battle with technology, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Josh Berkus), an earthling, wrote: >> Other than the disks, I am curious what other people are using in >> terms of the horsepower needed. The Quad server has been keeping >> up, but we are expecting quite high loads in the near future, and I >> am not sure if just by having the disks on a high-end storage will >> do it. > > Do a performance analysis of RH9. My experience with RH on Xeon has > been quite discouraging lately, and I've been recommending swapping > stock kernels for the RH kernel.
By that, you mean that you recommend that RHAT kernels be replaced by "stock" ones? > Of course, if this is RHES, rather than the standard, then test & > talk to RH instead. If you're spending the money, better demand value from the vendor... (And if RHAT is going to charge the big bucks, they'll have to provide service...) -- (reverse (concatenate 'string "gro.gultn" "@" "enworbbc")) http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/rdbms.html "I take it all back. Microsoft Exchange is RFC compliant. RFC 1925, point three." -- Author unknown ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
