Arjen van der Meijden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Well, I have discarded this type of query as "too inefficient" and found a
> better way

Loading the mapping into a table with an index and doing an update using
"from" to do a join seems likely to end up being the most efficient method.
Postgres would probably not even bother with the index and do a hash join.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to