On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Artimenko Igor wrote:
> 1. Sequential search and very high cost if set enable_seqscan to on;
> Seq scan on messageinfo ( cost=0.00..24371.30, rows =36802 )
>
> 2. Index scan but even bigger cost if set enable_seqscan to off;
> Index “messagesStatus” on messageinfo ( Cost=0.00..27220.72, rows=36802 )
So pg thinks that a sequential scan will be a little bit faster (The cost
is a little bit smaller). If you compare the actual runtimes maybe you
will see that pg was right. In this case the cost is almost the same so
the runtime is probably almost the same.
When you have more data pg will start to use the index since then it will
be faster to use an index compared to a seq. scan.
--
/Dennis Björklund
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
