Hi, Steve, On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 21:17:03 -0700 Steve Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 11:16:44AM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote: > > But you have to add table constraints restricting the time after adding > > the partition? > > Uhm... unless I'm confused that's not a meaningful thing in this context. > There's no rule that's putting insertions into an inherited table - the > decision of which inherited table to insert into is made at application > level. I thought of the query optimizer. I thought it could use the table constraints to drop tables when creating the union. But now I think that an index gives enough win, because the tree-based indices are rather quick at returning zero rows when the queried value is out of the indexed range. Greetings, Markus -- markus schaber | dipl. informatiker logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.logi-track.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
