On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 04:29:36PM +0200, Gabriele Bartolini wrote:
> FYI I set it to 1000 (the maximum) and I reduced the query's estimated time
> by the 90% (from 40000ms to 4000ms) although much slower than the index
> scan (200ms).

Note that the estimated times are _not_ in ms. They are in multiples of a
disk fetch (?). Thus, you can't compare estimated and real times like that.

/* Steinar */
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to