On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 04:29:36PM +0200, Gabriele Bartolini wrote: > FYI I set it to 1000 (the maximum) and I reduced the query's estimated time > by the 90% (from 40000ms to 4000ms) although much slower than the index > scan (200ms).
Note that the estimated times are _not_ in ms. They are in multiples of a disk fetch (?). Thus, you can't compare estimated and real times like that. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
