And obviously make sure you're vacuuming frequently.
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 10:38:14AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Steve,
>
> > I'm used to performance tuning on a select-heavy database, but this
> > will have a very different impact on the system. Does anyone have any
> > experience with an update heavy system, and have any performance hints
> > or hardware suggestions?
>
> Minimal/no indexes on the table(s). Raise checkpoint_segments and consider
> using commit_siblings/commit_delay if it's a multi-stream application.
> Figure out ways to do inserts instead of updates where possible, and COPY
> instead of insert, where possible. Put your WAL on its own disk resource.
>
> I'm a little curious as to what kind of app would be 95% writes. A log?
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> Aglio Database Solutions
> San Francisco
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
