At 13.30 07/10/2004, Aaron Werman wrote:
Consider how the fact table is going to be used, and review hacking it up
based on usage. Fact tables should be fairly narrow, so if there are extra
columns beyond keys and dimension keys consider breaking it into parallel
tables (vertical partitioning).


Hmm ... I have only an extra column. Sorry if I ask you to confirm this, but practically vertical partitioning allows me to divide a table into 2 tables (like if I cut them vertically, right?) having the same key. If I had 2 extra columns, that could be the case, couldn't it?


Horizontal partitioning is your friend; especially if it is large - consider
slicing the data into chunks. If the fact table is date driven it might be
worthwhile to break it into separate tables based on date key.  This wins in
reducing the working set of queries and in buffering. If there is a real
hotspot, such as current month's activity, you might want to keep a separate
table with just the (most) active data.Static tables of unchanged data can
simplify backups, etc., as well.

In this case, you mean I can chunk data into: "facts_04_08" for the august 2004 facts. Is this the case?


Otherwise, is it right my point of view that I can get good results by using a different approach, based on mixing vertical partitioning and the CLUSTER facility of PostgreSQL? Can I vertically partition also dimension keys from the fact table or not?

However, this subject is awesome and interesting. Far out ... data warehousing seems to be really continous modeling, doesn't it! :-)

Consider summary tables if you know what type of queries you'll hit.

At this stage, I can't predict it yet. But of course I need some sort of summary. I will keep it in mind.


Especially here, MVCC is not your friend because it has extra work to do for
aggregate functions.

Why does it have extra work? Do you mind being more precise, Aaron? It is really interesting. (thanks)


Cluster helps if you bulk load.

Is it maybe because I can update or build them once the load operation has finished?


In most warehouses, the data is downstream data from existing operational
systems.

That's my case too.

Because of that you're not able to use database features to
preserve integrity. In most cases, the data goes through an
extract/transform/load process - and the output is considered acceptable.
So, no RI is correct for star or snowflake design. Pretty much no anything
else that adds intelligence - no triggers, no objects, no constraints of any
sort. Many designers try hard to avoid nulls.

That's another interesting argument. Again, I had in mind the space efficiency principle and I decided to use null IDs for dimension tables if I don't have the information. I noticed though that in those cases I can't use any index and performances result very poor.


I have a dimension table 'categories' referenced through the 'id_category' field in the facts table. I decided to set it to NULL in case I don't have any category to associate to it. I believe it is better to set a '0' value if I don't have any category, allowing me not to use a "SELECT * from facts where id_category IS NULL" which does not use the INDEX I had previously created on that field.

On the hardware side - RAID5 might work here because of the low volume if
you can pay the write performance penalty. To size hardware you need to
estimate load in terms of transaction type (I usually make bucket categories
of small, medium, and large effort needs) and transaction rate. Then try to
estimate how much CPU and I/O they'll use.

Thank you so much again Aaron. Your contribution has been really important to me.


Ciao,
-Gabriele

"Let us not speak of them; but look, and pass on."

P.S.: Dante rules ... :-)

--
Gabriele Bartolini: Web Programmer, ht://Dig & IWA/HWG Member, ht://Check maintainer
Current Location: Prato, Toscana, Italia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.prato.linux.it/~gbartolini | ICQ#129221447
> "Leave every hope, ye who enter!", Dante Alighieri, Divine Comedy, The Inferno
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.773 / Virus Database: 520 - Release Date: 05/10/2004
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to