On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 06:32:32PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> This does raise a question for Josh though, which is "where's the
> oprofile results?"  If we do have major problems at the level of cache
> misses then oprofile would be able to prove it.

Or cachegrind. I've found it to be really effective at pinpointing cache
misses in the past (one CPU-intensive routine was sped up by 30% just by
avoiding a memory clear). :-)

/* Steinar */
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to