On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 06:32:32PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > This does raise a question for Josh though, which is "where's the > oprofile results?" If we do have major problems at the level of cache > misses then oprofile would be able to prove it.
Or cachegrind. I've found it to be really effective at pinpointing cache misses in the past (one CPU-intensive routine was sped up by 30% just by avoiding a memory clear). :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
