QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on site_rss s (cost=0.00..11863.16 rows=295 width=158) (actual time=17.414..791.937 rows=12 loops=1)
Filter: (site_name ~~* '%atari%'::text)
SubPlan
-> Seq Scan on user_choice u (cost=0.00..3.46 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.222..0.222 rows=0 loops=12)
Filter: ((id_site = $0) AND (id_user = 1))
Total runtime: 792.099 ms
First time I run the request I have a result in about 789 miliseconds !!???
I'm using PostgreSQL v7.4.6 with a Bi-Penitum III 933 Mhz and 1 Gb of RAM.
Any idea ... ? For the moment I'm going back to use the ilike solution ... but I was really thinking that Tsearch2 could be a better solution ...
Well I would be curious about what happens the second time you run the query.
The first time is kind of a bad example because it has to push the index into ram.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Regards,
-- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.commandprompt.com PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
begin:vcard fn:Joshua Drake n:Drake;Joshua org:Command Prompt, Inc. adr:;;PO Box 215 ;Cascade Locks;OR;97014;US email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Consultant tel;work:503-667-4564 tel;fax:503-210-0334 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.commandprompt.com version:2.1 end:vcard
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
