On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:47:54 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > So memcached becomes a very good place to stick data that's read often but > not > updated often, or alternately data that changes often but is disposable. An > example of the former is a user+ACL list; and example of the latter is web > session information ... or simple materialized views.
Has anyone tried at least two of 1. memcached 2. Tugela Cache (pretty much the same as memcached, I think) 3. Sharedance In that case: Do you have any comparative remarks? Links: 1: http://www.danga.com/memcached/ 2: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tugela_Cache http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/wikipedia/tugelacache/ 3: http://sharedance.pureftpd.org/ -- Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
