On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:47:54 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:

> So memcached becomes a very good place to stick data that's read often but 
> not 
> updated often, or alternately data that changes often but is disposable.   An 
> example of the former is a user+ACL list; and example of the latter is web 
> session information ... or simple materialized views.

Has anyone tried at least two of

1. memcached
2. Tugela Cache (pretty much the same as memcached, I think)
3. Sharedance

In that case: Do you have any comparative remarks?


1: http://www.danga.com/memcached/

2: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tugela_Cache

3: http://sharedance.pureftpd.org/

Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to