Adi Alurkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why does the append resulting from a inheritance take longer than one
> resulting from UNION ALL?
The index scan is where the time difference is:
> -> Index Scan using fftiallbgrgfid_1102715649 on
> f_f_all_base (cost=0.00..3.52 rows=1 width=51) (actual
> time=3.871..244.356 rows=28 loops=1)
> Index Cond: (group_id = 78745)
> Filter: (all_tidx @@ '\'mmcach\''::tsquery)
> -> Index Scan using fftiallbgrgfid_1102715649 on
> f_f_all_base (cost=0.00..3.52 rows=1 width=51) (actual
> time=3.714..79.996 rows=28 loops=1)
> Index Cond: (group_id = 78745)
> Filter: (all_tidx @@ '\'mmcach\''::tsquery)
One would have to suppose this is a caching effect, ie, the data is
already in RAM on the second try and doesn't have to be read from disk
again.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
