RAID controllers tend to use i960 or StrongARM CPUs that run at speeds that _aren't_ all that impressive. With software RAID, you can take advantage of the _enormous_ increases in the speed of the main CPU.

I don't know so much about FreeBSD's handling of this, but on Linux,
there's pretty strong indication that _SOFTWARE_ RAID is faster than
hardware RAID.


Unless something has changed though, you can't run raid 10
with linux software raid and raid 5 sucks for heavy writes.

J



It has the further merit that you're not dependent on some disk
formatting scheme that is only compatible with the model of RAID
controller that you've got, where if the controller breaks down, you
likely have to rebuild the whole array from scratch and your data is
toast.

The assumptions change if you're looking at really high end disk
arrays, but that's certainly another story.




--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL

begin:vcard
fn:Joshua Drake
n:Drake;Joshua
org:Command Prompt, Inc.
adr:;;PO Box 215 ;Cascade Locks;OR;97014;US
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Consultant
tel;work:503-667-4564
tel;fax:503-210-0334
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.commandprompt.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to