On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:32:12 -0600
Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I have this table, function and index in Postgres 7.3.6 ...
>
> """
> CREATE TABLE news_stories (
> id serial primary key NOT NULL,
> pub_date timestamp with time zone NOT NULL,
> ...
> )
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION get_year_trunc(timestamp with time zone)
> returns timestamp with time zone AS 'SELECT date_trunc(\'year\',$1);'
> LANGUAGE 'SQL' IMMUTABLE;
> CREATE INDEX news_stories_pub_date_year_trunc ON
> news_stories( get_year_trunc(pub_date) );
> """
>
> ...why does this query not use the index?
>
> db=# EXPLAIN SELECT DISTINCT get_year_trunc(pub_date) FROM
> news_stories;
> QUERY PLAN
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> Unique (cost=59597.31..61311.13 rows=3768 width=8)
> -> Sort (cost=59597.31..60454.22 rows=342764 width=8)
> Sort Key: date_trunc('year'::text, pub_date)
> -> Seq Scan on news_stories (cost=0.00..23390.55
> rows=342764
> width=8)
> (4 rows)
>
> The query is noticably slow (2 seconds) on a database with 150,000+
> records. How can I speed it up?
It's doing a sequence scan because you're not limiting the query in
the FROM clause. No point in using an index when you're asking for
the entire table. :)
---------------------------------
Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.wiles.org
---------------------------------
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
