Hi, @all, Greg Stark schrieb: > "Leeuw van der, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>I don't think EXPLAIN ANALYZE puts that much overhead on a query. > > EXPLAIN ANALYZE does indeed impose a significant overhead.
Additional note:
In some rare cases, you can experience just the opposite effect, explain
analyze can be quicker then the actual query.
This is the case for rather expensive send/output functions, like the
PostGIS ones:
lwgeom=# \timing
Zeitmessung ist an.
lwgeom=# explain analyze select setsrid(geom,4326) from adminbndy1;
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on adminbndy1 (cost=0.00..4.04 rows=83 width=89) (actual
time=11.793..2170.184 rows=83 loops=1)
Total runtime: 2170.834 ms
(2 Zeilen)
Zeit: 2171,688 ms
lwgeom=# \o /dev/null
lwgeom=# select setsrid(geom,4326) from adminbndy1;
Zeit: 9681,001 ms
BTW: I use the cheap setsrid(geom,4326) to force deTOASTing of the
geometry column. Not using it seems to ignore TOASTed columns in
sequential scan simulation.)
lwgeom=# explain analyze select geom from adminbndy1;
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on adminbndy1 (cost=0.00..3.83 rows=83 width=89) (actual
time=0.089..0.499 rows=83 loops=1)
Total runtime: 0.820 ms
(2 Zeilen)
Markus
--
markus schaber | dipl. informatiker
logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich
phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.logi-track.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
