On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 16:46:34 +0100,
  Markus Schaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Matthew,
> Matthew T. O'Connor schrieb:
> > The version of pg_autovacuum that I submitted for 8.0 could be
> > instructed "per table" but it didn't make the cut.  Aside from moved out
> > of contrib and integrated into the backend, per table autovacuum
> > settings is probably the next highest priority.
> What was the reason for non-acceptance?

It wasn't reviewed until very close to freeze due to people who could do
the review being busy and then there wasn't enough time to iron some things
out before the freeze.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to