I think his point was that 9 * 4 != 2400 Alex Turner netEconomist
On Apr 6, 2005 2:23 PM, Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 19:42 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 01:18:29PM -0400, Rod Taylor wrote: > > > Yeah, I think that can be done provided there is more than one worker. > > > My limit seems to be about 1000 transactions per second each with a > > > single insert for a single process (round trip time down the Fibre > > > Channel is large) but running 4 simultaneously only drops throughput to > > > about 900 per process (total of 2400 transactions per second) and the > > > machine still seemed to have lots of oomph to spare. > > > > Erm, have I missed something here? 900 * 4 = 2400? > > Nope. You've not missed anything. > > If I ran 10 processes and the requirement would be met. > -- > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
