Bill Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:Client is reporting that the size of an index is greater than the number of rows in the table (1.9 million vs. 1.5 million).
This thread seems to have wandered away without asking the critical question "what did you mean by that?"
It's not possible for an index to have more rows than there are in the table unless something is seriously broken. And there aren't any SQL operations that let you inspect an index directly anyway. So: what is the actual observation that led you to the above conclusion? Facts, please, not inferences.
I work for the client in question. Glad you picked up on that point. I covered the detail in my my post "How can an index be larger than a table" on 21 Apr. 2005. I guess I was too detailed, and too much info put people off.
quoting from there...
| |SELECT relname, relkind, reltuples, relpages FROM pg_class WHERE relname LIKE 'dave_data%'; | |relname relkind reltuples relpages |======================================= ======= ========= ======== |dave_data_update_events r 1593600.0 40209 |dave_data_update_events_event_id_key i 1912320.0 29271 |dave_data_update_events_event_id_seq S 1.0 1 |dave_data_update_events_lds_idx i 1593600.0 6139 |dave_data_update_events_obj_id_idx i 1593600.0 6139 |iso_pjm_data_update_events_obj_id_idx i 1593600.0 6139 |
Note that there are only 1593600 rows in the table, so why the 1912320 figure?
Of course I checked that the row count was correct...
| |EXPLAIN ANALYZE |select count(*) from iso_pjm_data_update_events | |QUERY PLAN |Aggregate (cost=60129.00..60129.00 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=35933.292..35933.293 rows=1 loops=1) | -> Seq Scan on iso_pjm_data_update_events (cost=0.00..56145.00 rows=1593600 width=0) (actual time=0.213..27919.497 rows=1593600 loops=1) |Total runtime: 35933.489 ms |
| |select count(*) from iso_pjm_data_update_events | |count |1593600 |
so it's not that there are any undeleted rows lying around
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly