On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:16:57PM -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote: > Seq Scan on usage_access (cost=0.00..1183396.40 rows=12713851 > width=116) (actual time=481796.22..481839.43 rows=3343 loops=1)
That's a gross misestimation -- four orders of magnitude off! Have you considering doing this in two steps, first getting out whatever comes from the subquery and then doing the query? Have you ANALYZEd recently? Do you have an index on atime? /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
