[Tobias Brox] > test=# set enable_seqscan=off; [Bruno Wolff III - Mon at 10:16:53PM -0500] > It isn't surprising that an index wasn't used since a sequential scan is > going to be faster in your test case. > > If you want to test this out, you to want use realistically sized tables.
Wrong. In this case I was not wondering about the planners choise of not using the index, but the fact that the planner could not find the index at all. Reproducing it on a simple table in a test environment was a valid strategy to solve this specific problem. -- Tobias Brox, Beijing ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
