Begin forwarded message:
From: Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Met vriendelijke groeten,
Date: Fri 17 Jun 2005 23:26:43 CEST
To: Yves Vindevogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Multiple disks: RAID 5 or PG Cluster
On Jun 17, 2005, at 5:24 PM, Yves Vindevogel wrote:
That means that only 2 / 5 of my discs are actual storage. That's a bit low, imho.If you're allergic to RAID10, then do RAID5. but you'll sacrifice performance. You'll hate life the day you blow a disk and have to rebuild everything, even if it is all easily restored.
Maybe I can ask my question again:
Would I go for RAID 5, RAID 0 or PG clustering
On 17 Jun 2005, at 22:21, Vivek Khera wrote:
Bien à vous,
Kind regards,
Yves Vindevogel
Implements
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mobile: +32 (478) 80 82 91
Kempische Steenweg 206 - 3500 Hasselt - Tel-Fax: +32 (11) 43 55 76
Web: http://www.implements.be
<x-tad-smaller>
First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.
Mahatma Ghandi.</x-tad-smaller>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings