Ok, I will hate that day, but it's only 6 months

Begin forwarded message:

From: Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri 17 Jun 2005 23:26:43 CEST
To: Yves Vindevogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Multiple disks: RAID 5 or PG Cluster

On Jun 17, 2005, at 5:24 PM, Yves Vindevogel wrote:

That means that only 2 / 5 of my discs are actual storage. That's a bit low, imho.

Maybe I can ask my question again:
Would I go for RAID 5, RAID 0 or PG clustering

On 17 Jun 2005, at 22:21, Vivek Khera wrote:
If you're allergic to RAID10, then do RAID5.  but you'll sacrifice performance.  You'll hate life the day you blow a disk and have to rebuild everything, even if it is all easily restored.

Met vriendelijke groeten,
Bien à vous,
Kind regards,

Yves Vindevogel

TIFF image

Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mobile: +32 (478) 80 82 91

Kempische Steenweg 206 - 3500 Hasselt - Tel-Fax: +32 (11) 43 55 76

Web: http://www.implements.be
First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.
Mahatma Ghandi.</x-tad-smaller>

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to