Indeed, I would have to do it through a function, where I check the number of pages, ....
It puts my weakest point in the middle then.

I could simply rewrite my query like you state, just to check.
I think all my queries are on one table only. (I report in a website on one table, that has been denormalized into other smaller tables for speed)
But the problem is on the big table.

I'm currently looking at another possibility, and that is generating XML files based upon my database. This would increase disk space enormously, but limit my problems with the database.
Since I am using Cocoon for the website, this is not such a problematic decision, disks are cheap and I need only a few modifications to my code.

On 24 Jun 2005, at 21:22, John A Meinel wrote:

Yves Vindevogel wrote:

Hi again all,

My queries are now optimised. They all use the indexes like they should.
However, there's still a slight problem when I issue the "offset" clause.

We have a table that contains 600.000 records
We display them by 25 in the webpage.
So, when I want the last page, which is: 600k / 25 = page 24000 - 1 = 23999, I issue the offset of 23999 * 25
This take a long time to run, about 5-10 seconds whereas offset below 100 take less than a second.

Can I speed this up ?

Met vriendelijke groeten,
Bien à vous,
Kind regards,

*Yves Vindevogel*

Postgres has the optimization that it will plan a query, and once it reaches the limit, it can stop even though there is more data available.
The problem you are having is that it has to go through "offset" rows first, before it can apply the limit.
If you can, (as mentioned in the other post), try to refine your index so that you can reverse it for the second half of the data.

This is probably tricky, as you may not know how many rows you have (or the amount might be changing).

A potentially better thing, is if you have an index you are using, you could use a subselect so that the only portion that needs to have 60k rows is a single column.

Maybe an example:
Instead of saying:

SELECT * FROM table1, table2 WHERE table1.id = table2.id ORDER BY table1.date OFFSET x LIMIT 25;

You could do:

(SELECT id FROM table1 OFFSET x LIMIT 25) as subselect
JOIN table1 ON subselect.id = table1.id
, table2
WHERE table1.id = table2.id;

That means that the culling process is done on only a few rows of one table, and the rest of the real merging work is done on only a few rows.

It really depends on you query, though, as what rows you are sorting on has a big influence on how well this will work.


Met vriendelijke groeten,
Bien à vous,
Kind regards,

Yves Vindevogel

TIFF image

Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mobile: +32 (478) 80 82 91

Kempische Steenweg 206 - 3500 Hasselt - Tel-Fax: +32 (11) 43 55 76

Web: http://www.implements.be
First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.
Mahatma Ghandi.</x-tad-smaller>

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to