On 7/19/05, PFC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What happens if, say at iteration 6000 (a bit after the mess starts),
> you
> pause it for a few minutes and resume. Will it restart with a plateau like
> at the beginning of the test ? or not ?
Not sure... my benchmark is designed to represent what the database
will do under "typical" circumstances, and unfortunately these are
typical for the application. However, I can see about adding some
delays, though multiple minutes would be absurd in the application.
Perhaps a 5-10 second day? Would that still be interesting?
> What if, during this pause, you disconnect and reconnect, or restart
> the
> postmaster, or vacuum, or analyze ?
Well, I don't have the numbers any more, but restarting the postmaster
has no effect, other than the first few hundreds COPYs are worse than
anything (3-4x slower), but then it goes back to following the trend
line. The data in the chart for v8.0.3 includes running pg_autovacuum
(5 minutes).
Chris
--
| Christopher Petrilli
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
