On 7/19/05, Christopher Petrilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like the CVS HEAD is definately "better," but not by a huge
> amount.  The only difference is I wasn't run autovacuum in the
> background (default settings), but I don't think this explains it.
> Here's a graph of the differences and density of behavior:
> http://blog.amber.org/diagrams/pgsql_copy_803_cvs.png
> I can provide the raw data.  Each COPY was 500 rows.  Note that fsync
> is turned off here.  Maybe it'd be more stable with it turned on?

I've updated this with trend-lines.


| Christopher Petrilli

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to