On 7/19/05, Christopher Petrilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like the CVS HEAD is definately "better," but not by a huge > amount. The only difference is I wasn't run autovacuum in the > background (default settings), but I don't think this explains it. > Here's a graph of the differences and density of behavior: > > http://blog.amber.org/diagrams/pgsql_copy_803_cvs.png > > I can provide the raw data. Each COPY was 500 rows. Note that fsync > is turned off here. Maybe it'd be more stable with it turned on?
I've updated this with trend-lines. Chris -- | Christopher Petrilli | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq