On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 12:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think that this refutes the original scheme of using the same fuzz
> factor for both startup and total cost comparisons, and therefore
> propose the attached patch.
> Comments?

Looks good. I think it explains a few other wierd perf reports also.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to