Andreas Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> As far as the question "can PG do 1-2k xact/sec", the answer is "yes
>> if you throw enough hardware at it". Spending enough money on the
>> disk subsystem is the key ...
>>
> The 1-2k xact/sec for MySQL seems suspicious, sounds very much like
> write-back cached, not write-through, esp. considering that heavy
> concurrent write access isn't said to be MySQLs strength...
Advertising
> I wonder if preserving the database after a fatal crash is really
> necessary, since the data stored sounds quite volatile; in this case,
> fsync=false might be sufficient.
Yeah, that's something to think about. If you do need full transaction
safety, then you *must* have a decent battery-backed-write-cache setup,
else your transaction commit rate will be limited by disk rotation
speed --- for instance, a single connection can commit at most 250 xacts
per second if the WAL log is on a 15000RPM drive. (You can improve this
to the extent that you can spread activity across multiple connections,
but I'm not sure you can expect to reliably have 8 or more connections
ready to commit each time the disk goes 'round.)
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
