> That seems quite peculiar; AFAICS the pgstat code shouldn't be any > slower than before. At first I thought it might be because we'd > increased PGSTAT_ACTIVITY_SIZE, but actually that happened before > 8.0 release, so it shouldn't be a factor in this comparison.
Advertising
Just FYI the last time I looked at stats was in the 8.0 beta period. > Can anyone else confirm a larger penalty for stats_command_string in > HEAD than in 8.0? A self-contained test case would be nice too. looking into it. Merlin ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
