On 8/24/05, Alexandre Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i wouldn't be so stunned if the newer machine was ( say ) twice faster > than the older server, but over three times faster is disturbing.
RAID5 on so few spindles is a known losing case for PostgreSQL. You'd be far, far better off doing a pair of RAID1 sets or a single RAID10 set. /rls -- :wq ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org