On 8/24/05, Alexandre Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> i wouldn't be so stunned if the newer machine was ( say ) twice faster
> than the older server, but over three times faster is disturbing.

RAID5 on so few spindles is a known losing case for PostgreSQL.  You'd
be far, far better off doing a pair of RAID1 sets or a single RAID10
set.

/rls

-- 
:wq

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to