""Ahmad Fajar"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Hi Qingqing,
>
> I don't know whether the statistic got is bad or good, this is the
> statistic:
Please do it in this way:
1. Start postmaster with "stats_start_collector=true" and
"stats_block_level=true".
2. Use psql connect it, do something like this:
test=# select pg_stat_reset();
pg_stat_reset
---------------
t
(1 row)
test=# select * from pg_statio_user_indexes ;
relid | indexrelid | schemaname | relname | indexrelname | idx_blks_read |
idx_
blks_hit
-------+------------+------------+---------+--------------+---------------+-----
---------
16385 | 16390 | public | test | test_idx | 0 |
0
(1 row)
test=# select count(*) from test where a <= 1234;
count
-------
7243
(1 row)
test=# select * from pg_statio_user_indexes ;
relid | indexrelid | schemaname | relname | indexrelname | idx_blks_read |
idx_
blks_hit
-------+------------+------------+---------+--------------+---------------+-----
---------
16385 | 16390 | public | test | test_idx | 55 |
0
(1 row)
This gives us that to get "select count(*) from test where a <= 1234", I
have to read 55 index blocks (no index block hit since I just restart
postmaster so the bufferpool is empty).
Regards,
Qingqing
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
