[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Harris) writes:
> On Oct 3, 2005, at 5:02 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>> I thought this might be interesting, not the least due to the
>> extremely low
>> price ($150 + the price of regular DIMMs):
> Replying before my other post came through.. It looks like their
> benchmarks are markedly improved since the last article I read on
> this.  There may be more interest now..

It still needs a few more generations worth of improvement.

1.  It's still limited to SATA speed
2.  It's not ECC smart

What I'd love to see would be something that much smarter, or, at
least, that pushes the limits of SATA speed, and which has both a
battery on board and enough CF storage to cope with outages.
output = reverse("gro.mca" "@" "enworbbc")
We  all live in  a yellow  subroutine, a  yellow subroutine,  a yellow

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to