"Federico Simonetti (Liveye)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm encountering a quite strange performance problem.
Advertising
The problem stems from the horrid misestimation of the number of rows
fetched from detail0009:
> " -> Seq Scan on detail0009 (cost=0.00..20500.11
> rows=26 width=1005) (actual time=453.000..5983.000 rows=53588 loops=1)"
> " Filter: ((txcontenttype ~~* '%html%'::text)
> AND ((vchost)::text ~~* '%www.%'::text))"
When the planner is off by a factor of two thousand about the number of
rows involved, it's not very likely to produce a good plan :-(
In the OR case the rowcount estimate is 6334, which is somewhat closer
to reality (only about a factor of 10 off, looks like), and that changes
the plan to something that works acceptably well.
Assuming that this is web-log data, the prevalence of www and html
together is hardly surprising, but PG's statistical mechanisms will
never realize it. Not sure about a good workaround. Does it make
sense to combine the two conditions into one?
(vchost || txcontenttype) ilike '%www.%html%'
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
