Rich Doughty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> EXPLAIN SELECT *
> FROM
>      tokens.ta_tokens      t  LEFT JOIN
>      tokens.ta_tokenhist   h1 ON t.token_id = h1.token_id LEFT JOIN
>      tokens.ta_tokenhist   h2 ON t.token_id = h2.token_id
> WHERE
>      h1.histdate = 'now';

> EXPLAIN SELECT *
> FROM
>      tokens.ta_tokens      t  LEFT JOIN
>      tokens.ta_tokenhist   h1 ON t.token_id = h1.token_id LEFT JOIN
>      tokens.ta_tokenhist   h2 ON t.token_id = h2.token_id
> WHERE
>      h2.histdate = 'now';

The reason these are different is that the second case constrains only
the last-to-be-joined table, so the full cartesian product of t and h1
has to be formed.  If this wasn't what you had in mind, you might be
able to rearrange the order of the LEFT JOINs, but bear in mind that
in general, changing outer-join ordering changes the results.  (This
is why the planner won't fix it for you.)

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Reply via email to