On 11/18/05 8:13 AM, "Alan Stange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I told you in my initial post that I was observing numbers in excess ofProve me wrong, post your data.
what you claiming, but you seemed to think I didn't know how to measure
an IO rate.
I should note too that our system uses about 20% of a single cpu when
performing a table scan at >100MB/s of IO. I think you claimed the
system would be cpu bound at this low IO rate.