On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 11:20:09PM +0100, Yves Vindevogel wrote: > 8.1, hmm, that's brand new.
Yes, but give it a try, at least in a test environment. The more people use it, the more we'll find out if it has any problems. > But, still, it's quite some coding for a complete recordset, not ? How so? The examples I posted are almost identical to how you'd return a composite type created with CREATE TYPE or SETOF that type, except that you declare the return columns as INOUT or OUT parameters and you no longer have to create a separate type. If you're referring to how I wrote two sets of assignments and RETURN NEXT statements, you don't have to do it that way: you can use a loop, just as you would with any other set-returning function. -- Michael Fuhr ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
