Peter, On 1/9/06 9:23 AM, "peter royal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a 2-disk RAID0 Your 2-disk results look fine - what about your 8-disk results? Given that you want to run in production with RAID10, the most you should expect is 2x the 2-disk results using all 8 of your disks. If you want the best rate for production while preserving data integrity, I recommend running your Areca in RAID5, in which case you should expect 3.5x your 2-disk results (7 drives). You can assume you'll get that if you use XFS + readahead. OTOH - I'd like to see your test results anyway :-) - Luke ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match