"Gary Doades" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think the reason I wasn't seeing performance issues with normal sort > operations is because they use work_mem not maintenance_work_mem which was > only set to 2048 anyway. Does that sound right?
Very probable. Do you want to test the theory by jacking that up? ;-) regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly