On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 09:12:08AM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote: > > > design 1 is normalized and better > > > design 2 is denormalized and a bad approach no matter the RDBMS > > > > How is design 1 denormalized? > > It isn't :)...he said it is normalized. Design 2 may or may not be > de-normalized (IMO there is not enough information to make that > determination) but as stated it's a good idea to split the table on > practical grounds.
Err, sorry, got the number backwards. My point is that 2 isn't denormalized afaik, at least not based just on the example. But yes, in a case like this, vertical partitioning can make a lot of sense. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
