Can you post an explain analyze for the delete query?  That will at
least tell you if it is the delete itself which is slow, or a trigger /
referential integrity constraint check.  Which version of PG is this?

-- Mark Lewis

On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 12:58 -0500, Eric Lauzon wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
>       We have an issue where we have a database with many tables.
>       The layout of the database is 3 set of look alike tables with different 
> names.
>       Each set of tables has some referential integrety that point back to 
> the main
>       control table.
> 
>       On two set of tables we are able to efficiently delete referential and 
> main record
>       without a problems, but on the 3rd set we have an issue where the 
> control table is clugged
>       and delete seem to take forever , as example on the first two set a 
> delete of 60K record take about
>       4 second to 10 second but on the 3rd set it can take as long as 3hours.
> 
>       This seem to be only affecting one database , the schema and way of 
> doing is replicated elsewhere
>       and if efficient.
> 
>       The question is, even after droping 3rd set integrity , dumping the 
> table data , deleting the table,
>       doing a manual checkpoint and recreating the table with the dump data , 
> with or without referential
>       integrity , the problems still araise.
> 
>       If we copy the data from the live table and do a create table aaa as 
> select * from problematic_table;
>       the table aaa operations are normal and efficient.
> 
>       This is why our investigation brought us to the folowing questions:
> 
>       1. Are postgresql data file name are hashed references to table name(as 
> oracle)? [~path to data EX:/var/log/pgsql/data/[arbitraty                     
>      numbers]/[datafile]]?
> 
>       2. If the data files are corrupted and we re-create is it possible it 
> uses the same files thus creating the same issue?
> 
>       3. Since we know that all the tables has that problems is there an 
> internal table with undisclosed references to tables data files?
>       
>       I hope the questions were clear.
> 
>       Have a good day, and thank you in advance.
> 
> 
> Eric Lauzon
> [Recherche & Développement]
> Above Sécurité / Above Security
> Tél  : (450) 430-8166
> Fax : (450) 430-1858
> 
> AVERTISSEMENT CONCERNANT LA CONFIDENTIALITÉ 
> 
> Le présent message est à l'usage exclusif du ou des destinataires mentionnés 
> ci-dessus. Son contenu est confidentiel et peut être assujetti au secret 
> professionnel. Si vous avez reçu le présent message par erreur, veuillez nous 
> en aviser immédiatement et le détruire en vous abstenant d'en faire une 
> copie, d'en divulguer le contenu ou d'y donner suite.
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> 
> This communication is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee 
> identified above. Its content is confidential and may contain privileged 
> information. If you have received this communication by error, please notify 
> the sender and delete the message without copying or disclosing it.
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
>                http://archives.postgresql.org

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to