[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Craig A. James") writes:
> Gorshkov wrote:
>> /flame on
>> if you were *that* worried about performance, you wouldn't be using
>> PHP or *any* interperted language
>> /flame off
>> sorry - couldn't resist it :-)
>
> I hope this was just a joke. You should be sure to clarify - there
> might be some newbie out there who thinks you are seriously
> suggesting coding major web sites in some old-fashioned compiled
> language.
Actually, this seems not so bad a point...
If people are so interested in micro-managing certain bits of how
performance works, then it seems an excellent question to ask why NOT
write all the CGIs in C.
After all, CGI in C *won't* suffer from the performance troubles
associated with repetitively loading in Perl/PHP frameworks (which is
why things like FastCGI, mod_perl, and such came about), and you can
get a fair level of assurance that the compiled C won't be the
performance bottleneck.
And yes, it does become natural to ask "why not write CGIs in ASM?"
;-)
--
(format nil "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "cbbrowne" "acm.org")
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/lisp.html
"When I was a boy of fourteen, my father was so ignorant I could
hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be
twenty-one, I was astonished at how much the old man had learned in
seven years." -- Mark Twain
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
