On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 06:49:48PM -0400, Jan de Visser wrote: > On Tuesday 02 May 2006 16:28, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 10:59:56PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > > > Pgadmin can give misleading times for queries that return large result > > > sets over a network, due to: > > > > > > 1/ It takes time to format the (large) result set for display. > > > 2/ It has to count the time spent waiting for the (large) result set to > > > travel across the network. > > > > > > You aren't running Pgadmin off the dev server are you? If not check your > > > network link to dev and prod - is one faster than the other? (etc). > > > > > > To eliminate Pgadmin and the network as factors try wrapping your query > > > in a 'SELECT count(*) FROM (your query here) AS a', and see if it > > > changes anything! > > > > FWIW, I've found problems running PostgreSQL on Windows in a multi-CPU > > environment on w2k3. It runs fine for some period, and then CPU and > > throughput drop to zero. So far I've been unable to track down any more > > information than that, other than the fact that I haven't been able to > > reproduce this on any single-CPU machines. > > I have had previous correspondence about this with Magnus (search -general > and -hackers). If you uninstall SP1 the problem goes away. We played a bit > with potential fixes but didn't find any.
Interesting; does SP2 fix the problem? Anything we can do over here to help? -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
