Hi,
please help me with the following problem:
I have noticed a strange performance behaviour using a commit statement on two
different machines. On one of the machines the commit is many times faster than
on the other machine which has faster hardware. Server and client are running
always on the same machine.
Server version (same on both machines): PostgreSQL 8.1.3. (same binaries as
well)
PC1:
----
Pentium 4 (2.8 GHz)
1GB RAM
IDE-HDD (approx. 50 MB/s rw), fs: ext3
Mandrake Linux: Kernel 2.4.22
PC2:
----
Pentium 4 (3.0 GHz)
2GB RAM
SCSI-HDD (approx. 65 MB/s rw), fs: ext3
Mandrake Linux: Kernel 2.4.32
Both installations of the database have the same configuration, different from
default are only the following settings on both machines:
shared_buffers = 20000
listen_addresses = '*'
max_stack_depth = 4096
pgbench gives me the following results:
PC1:
----
transaction type: TPC-B (sort of)
scaling factor: 1
number of clients: 1
number of transactions per client: 10
number of transactions actually processed: 10/10
tps = 269.905533 (including connections establishing)
tps = 293.625393 (excluding connections establishing)
PC2:
----
transaction type: TPC-B (sort of)
scaling factor: 1
number of clients: 1
number of transactions per client: 10
number of transactions actually processed: 10/10
tps = 46.061935 (including connections establishing)
tps = 46.519634 (excluding connections establishing)
My own performance test sql script which inserts and (auto)commits some data
into a simple table produces the following log output in the server log:
PC1:
----
LOG: duration: 1.441 ms statement: INSERT INTO performance_test VALUES
(500938362, 'Xawhefjmd');
STATEMENT: INSERT INTO performance_test VALUES (500938362, 'Xawhefjmd');
PC2:
----
LOG: duration: 29.979 ms statement: INSERT INTO performance_test VALUES
(500938362, 'Xawhefjmd');
STATEMENT: INSERT INTO performance_test VALUES (500938362, 'Xawhefjmd');
I created a 'strace' one both machines which is interesting:
Opening the socket:
-------------------
PC1: socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 10 <0.000021>
PC2: socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 8 <0.000015>
PC1: bind(10, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(0),
sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}, 16) = 0 <0.000007>
PC2: bind (8, {sin_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(0),
sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}}, 16) = 0 <0.000007>
PC1: getsockname(10, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(32820),
sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}, [16]) = 0 <0.000005>
PC2: getsockname( 8, {sin_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(36219),
sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}}, [16]) = 0 <0.000005>
PC1: connect(10, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(5432),
sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 16) = 0 <0.000440>
PC2: connect( 8, {sin_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(5432),
sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}}, 16) = 0 <0.000394>
PC1: setsockopt(10, SOL_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, [1], 4) = 0 <0.000006>
PC2: setsockopt (8, SOL_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, [1], 4) = 0 <0.000004>
Inserting and commiting the data: <exec. time>
---------------------------------
PC1:
----
send(10, "B\....\0<\0INSERT INTO performance_test VAL"..., 175, 0) = 175
<0.000015>
recv(10, "2\....0\17INSERT 0 1\0Z\0\0\0\5T", 8192, 0) = 53 <0.000007>
send(10, "B\0\0\0\17\0S_2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0E\0\0\0\t\0\0\0\0\1S\0\0\0\4", 31, 0) =
31 <0.000011>
recv(10, "2\0\0\0\4C\0\0\0\vCOMMIT\0Z\0\0\0\5I", 8192, 0) = 23 <0.000211>
PC2:
----
send(8, "B\....\0<\0INSERT INTO performance_test VAL"..., 175, 0) = 175
<0.000014>
recv(8, "2\....0\17INSERT 0 1\0Z\0\0\0\5T", 8192, 0) = 53 <0.000005>
send(8, "B\0\0\0\17\0S_2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0E\0\0\0\t\0\0\0\0\1S\0\0\0\4", 31, 0) =
31 <0.000009>
recv(8, "2\0\0\0\4C\0\0\0\vCOMMIT\0Z\0\0\0\5I", 8192, 0) = 23 <0.0253>
Every command is a bit faster on PC2 except the last one which is many times
slower.
Any help or hint where to look at would be highly appreciated because I'm
running out of ideas ;-).
regards,
Christian
******************************************
The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, may contain
confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity to whom they are addressed and may be subject to legal privilege. If
you have received this e-mail in error you should notify the sender immediately
by reply e-mail, delete the message from your system and notify your system
manager. Please do not copy it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to
any other person. The views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely
those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. The
recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of
viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused, directly or
indirectly, by any virus transmitted in this email.
******************************************
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
