Brian,
On 9/11/06 8:50 AM, "Brian Wipf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a great idea. One question though. If I put all 16 drives in a
> RAID 10 for the database, where should I put the logs? On that large
> RAID set? If I use a RAID controller with a BB cache for the mirrored
> laptop drives, might I be able to use that for the logs and OS?
I think I'd probably reserve a couple of the data drives for the WAL, at 16
you have far oversubscribed non-MPP postgres' ability to use them for
bandwidth and you'd only lose about 5% of your seek performance by dropping
a couple of drives.
The laptop drives are really slow, so putting your WAL on them might be a
net loss.
Alternately you could go with dual SFF SAS drives, which are the same
physical size as the laptop drives but are 10,000 RPM SCSI equivalent. Heat
removal will be more of an issue with these potentially, especially if you
have a lot of activity on them.
- Luke
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
