I think I am being stupid now.

The > query was returning so many rows (87% of the rows in the table)
that a seq-scan was of course the best way.

Sorry - all is now working and the problem was the locale issue.

Thanks so much for your help everyone.

--
Simon Godden

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

              http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to